Design Research Methodology / Project 3: Primary Research

15.5.2022 - 19.6.2022 (Week 8 - Week 12)
Britney Chow Pei Jun / 0350043 / BDCM
Design Research Methodology
Project 3: Primary Research


JUMPLINKS


LECTURES

  • Notes were provided by Dr. Hayati and Dr. Jinchi.
Fig 1.1; Week 6 Lecture Notes;

Fig 1.2; Week 6 Lecture Notes; 

Fig 1.3; Week 7 Lecture Notes; 

Fig 1.4; Week 7 Lecture Notes; 


INSTRUCTIONS



PROJECT 3: PRIMARY RESEARCH

Primary Research

In this assignment, we are to brainstorm for the best methods to implement in our research. There are a lot of research methods. I have chosen 2 methods being survey questionnaire and focus group interview. The below is my progressions. 

Fig 1.5; Primary Research Planning Draft; (17/5/22)

Fig 1.6; Analysis of Method 1: Survey; (17/6/2022)

Fig 1.7; Analysis of Method 2: Focus Group Interview; (17/6/22)

Final Project 1: Research Proposal

Fig 1.4; Project 3: Primary Research in PDF; (19/6/2022)


FEEDBACKS

WEEK 8

*NO CLASS FOR THIS WEEK DUE TO INDEPENDANT LEARNING WEEK*

WEEK 9

General Feedbacks: One shouldn’t be biased in how you phrase the questions. 

Specific Feedback: There’s quite a lot of open-ended questions. You can consider interviewing game developers. Game developers don't mean good gamers, though they have to design something, so you can interview them for technical support. You can send a message to them, but it isn’t guaranteed that they will reply. Audio interviews are usually transcribed, so it is okay if you don’t waste the time to do that. 

WEEK 10

General Feedbacks: It’s important to join the tutorial sessions. Remember to number the questions.

Specific Feedback: It’s good that you have labeled the sections. You have to make sure the questions you ask are related to the questions and are enough for your research, as it is important. In the demographic section, the age group shouldn’t have a big range, so it should be 5 years instead, as there are differences in thinking between them. The area section, people in North America and South America have different thinking as well, so it should be separated instead. You should also show appreciation for those participants that didn’t meet the requirements. 

WEEK 11

General Feedbacks: -

Specific Feedback: People who participated in the game developing and people who participated in testing out the game are different. Your questions for the focus group interview are semi-structured interview questions as you are asking other questions than the list according to the dynamics of the interview. It would be great if you can get people from the other side of the world as they have different thinking and would thus provide a different perspective of opinions.

WEEK 12

General Feedbacks: -

Specific Feedback: You can try and self evaluate the methods used. 

REFLECTIONS

WEEK 8

In this week, we are to start our primary research. This part usually makes me feel sad because I do not have a lot of friends to help me with this. Even if I do, most of them do not have the same interest as me regarding this topic. Sometimes, I find it hard to search for participants to distribute the survey to. Aside from that, I think that doing a survey, while having its cons, is actually quite convenient in gathering public opinions and stuff. It is sad that I may not be able to gather a large sample, but I think I will just do what I can do first. 

WEEK 9

At first, I planned to do an email interview with experts of the field, however, I couldn’t find their emails anywhere and thus unable to contact them. I started out as really excited when planning for this, but things just don’t go that smooth for me. Although, I still haven’t given up on trying to interview the experts. I think that if I still won't be able to make any progress in week 10, I will just give up… 

WEEK 10

In this week, I have already started on the questionnaire so that I could distribute the questionnaire and have more time to collect the data. Since I have another method to collect the desired data, I need to manage my time wisely as well considering I have other assignments and tasks to do. After letting my lecturer check my questionnaire, I started to have some afterthoughts. I think that perhaps my questionnaire looks too messy, and the questions are pretty jumpy as well, so I decide to organize the whole section and what my purpose for that part is. And I’m quite relieved that I did that, because I was able to rethink the questions I ask, and also added even more questions to further help me with my research. This is done after the consultation I have with my lecturer, and I feel extremely guilty to have to disturb her through Telegram, but I thought I couldn’t waste another week just to have her approval as time is really tight for me as mentioned before. With that, I decided to send my lecturer the edited questionnaire with a short description on what I have already changed and or add. Luckily, my lecturer replied to me within that day, and I’m very grateful for that, so I straight away distributed it to all the social media or other platforms I planned to use. I think that this part of the assignment is actually pretty fun, as I was pretty excited to see people’s opinions and thoughts about my topic. 

WEEK 11

At the same time when I was conducting my method 1, which is a survey questionnaire, I was also conducting my second method, which is focus group interview. This part is much more difficult compared to the first method as I have looked continuously for more participants, but either the people that I looked for are too busy, or did not see my messages that I have sent. I feel quite dejected about this, nonetheless, I still went ahead and interviewed the participants I had first. The interview took longer than I expected as they had to think about how to exactly answer the questions, what the questions meant. I’m also very grateful to them due to how they spent so much time with the interview and also provided honest opinions and thoughts to it. 

WEEK 12

In this week, I’m basically analyzing the data collected and also continuing to interview the participants. Analyzing the data definitely took a lot more time than what I have anticipated, due to how many questions I have asked and also I have reorganized the open-ended questions and more. In the middle of this, I have found quite a lot of faults in my questionnaire and also, I found out that I did not account for all the disadvantages for the method as well, because there are a few participants that did not provide serious answers. Regardless, I still managed to compile them and analyze them to the best of my abilities. For the second part, which is the focus group interview, I found out that it is also quite hard for me to interview due to how some of them are from different countries, and I have to choose a suitable time for them. Luckily, those don’t prove to be too big of a problem, as I myself am someone who doesn’t sleep early. That aside, I was quite disappointed to see that one of the participants had decided that she did not have the time to spare for the interview after she accepted my request to interview her. And due to how last minute it is, I have no choice but to decide that my participants for the focus group became from 6 to 5. That’s what I have worried a lot about when I was thinking about conducting this method. I am quite worried that either the participants would think that the interview is too boring and just left halfway, or renege on their word. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Major Project // Final Submission

Game Development // Task 1: Game Proposal

Design Principle: Project 2